President Obama offered few concrete suggestions for spending cuts this week in his speech on reducing the federal debt, but he had lots to say about raising taxes.
“As a country that values fairness, wealthier individuals have traditionally borne a greater share of this burden than the middle class or those less fortunate. Everybody pays, but the wealthier have borne a little more,” the president said. So he wants to raise the top marginal tax rate to 39.6 percent and eliminate itemized deductions for the top 2 percent of earners.
What the president didn’t say is that he has taken full advantage of each and every tax deduction available to him in order to lower his taxes on his more than $5 million per year income.
No one forces Obama to take these deductions, which he objects to so strenuously for everyone else in his income bracket. So let’s take a look at the deductions he took last year. (The president’s 2009 return and that of Vice President Joe Biden are online):
In 2009, Obama took itemized deductions of $514,819, a foreign tax credit of $59,372, and a deduction for interest on his home of $52,195. He was also able to take a deduction for $49,000 he contributed to his self-employed retirement fund.
If he hadn’t taken these deductions, he’d have paid taxes on another $675,386, which in his income bracket would’ve meant he owed around $200,000 more in taxes at the top marginal tax rate of 35 percent.
Furthermore, he instructed the Nobel committee to donate his $1.4 million Nobel Prize directly to 10 charities — thereby avoiding the necessity of declaring the money as income on which he would have owed another $490,000 in taxes.
If the president is so appalled at the rich and their ability to hire accountants to take advantage of each and every deduction, why doesn’t he simply take the standard deduction on his tax return, like most Americans? In 2009, he could have claimed an $11,400 standard deduction for married couples, as well as $7,300 for his two daughters. Admittedly, that’s a loss of more than $650,000 in deductions — but at least he could avoid looking like a hypocrite by advocating one thing for everyone else and doing quite another himself.
Obama might even get a few liberal millionaire and billionaire friends to go along if he leads by example. Take Obama’s good friend Jeffrey Immelt, General Electric CEO and chairman of the White House Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.
Immelt’s firm will pay no federal income taxes on the more than $5 billion it earned in the US in 2010. It’s all perfectly legal. GE can take net operating losses to offset its tax liabilities, including certain carryovers from previous years. What’s more, Immelt has a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders to take advantage of all tax deductions the company is entitled to.
But there’s nothing that stops Immelt from paying additional taxes on his personal income if he chooses to forego deductions. According to GE’s annual SEC filings, it paid him $7.3 million in cash and perquisites worth almost $400,000 (plus to stock currently worth $7.4 million, which vests over time).
Perhaps Obama should ask Immelt to skip his itemized deductions for the year and fork over $5 million to Uncle Sam. Somehow, I don’t see that happening. Like most limousine liberals — who fly private jets to global-warming conferences and live in 10,000 square-foot houses — Obama talks a great line but lives differently.
When he voluntarily gives up his deductions and asks his wealthy donors to do the same, he’ll have some moral authority to argue that he wants a tax code that “is fair and simple — so that the amount of taxes you pay isn’t determined by what kind of accountant you can afford.” Until then, spare us the hypocrisy, Mr. President.