PLACERVILLE, Calif. — Jaycee Dugard, the California kidnapping victim who was held captive for 18 years, said today that her life was stolen by her abductors.
Dugard made her first public statement about her ordeal in an emotional declaration her mother read on her behalf Thursday at the ongoing sentencing hearing for defendants Phillip and Nancy Garrido.
Dugard did not attend the hearing.
The defendants pleaded guilty to kidnapping and raping Dugard when she was 11. She was confined to a hidden backyard compound where she eventually lived with two daughters fathered by Phillip Garrido.
A judge on imposed the maximum possible sentence of 431 years to life on the 60-year-old Garrido, calling the defendants’ treatment of Dugard evil and reprehensible.
Nancy Garrido was sentenced to 36 years to life. Both have waived their right to appeal.
In her victim impact statement, Dugard says she hated every second of every day for those 18 years. Dugard told Nancy Garrido that her actions were evil and wrong.
The two defendants pleaded guilty to kidnapping and rape in late April under a deal that calls for Phillip Garrido to receive a prison term of 431 years to life. He also pleaded guilty to committing lewd acts captured on video.
The deal was designed, in part, to spare Dugard and her children from having to testify at a trial.
Now 31, Dugard was given an opportunity to present El Dorado County Superior Judge Douglas Phimister with an oral or written statement about her experience. Prosecutors typically encourage crime victims and their families to prepare detailed victim impact statements so courts can factor their suffering into sentencing decisions.
Dugard, who has written a memoir set to be published next month, has strived to preserve her privacy in the 22 months since she was identified during a chance meeting with Phillip Garrido’s parole officer.
In a presentencing memo justifying a sentence of hundreds of years for Phillip Garrido, who was on parole for a 1976 rape and kidnapping when Dugard was taken, District Attorney Vern Pierson said that Dugard spent the first one-and-a-half years after her kidnapping locked in a backyard shed.
She did not leave the backyard for the first four years after her abduction.
“Phillip Garrido should have spent the rest of his life in prison for the crimes he committed in 1976. He never should have been allowed back on the street to even have the opportunity to commit the crimes he committed in this case,” Pierson said. Garrido “stole the childhood and innocence from an 11-year-old child.”
The Garridos and their defense lawyers also have an opportunity to address Judge Phimister, but attorney Susan Gellman, who represents Phillip Garrido, said he won’t have a statement.
Defendants often use sentencing hearings to express remorse or provide biographical information that could persuade a court to impose a lighter sentence.
Dugard was grabbed by Nancy Garrido from the South Lake Tahoe street where her family lived and forced into a car driven by Phillip Garrido on June 10, 1991. The abduction occurred as Dugard’s stepfather watched her walk to a school bus stop.
Authorities have said the couple drove the girl 168 miles south to their home in Antioch and held her prisoner there for the next 18 years, four months and 16 days. At first, she was locked in the shed then confined to a series of tents she would come to share with the daughters fathered by Phillip Garrido and delivered by his wife.
The defendants were arrested in August 2009 after Phillip Garrido inexplicably brought his ragtag clan to a meeting with his parole officer, who had no idea the convicted rapist had been living with a young woman and two girls he described as his nieces.
Dugard at first tried to conceal her identity, telling authorities she was hiding from an abusive husband in Minnesota and giving her name as Alyssa, Garrido eventually acknowledged kidnapping her, and Dugard disclosed her identity.
Her reappearance proved a costly embarrassment for California parole officials, who had to explain how a parolee under intensive supervision could live with his victim and have children with her undetected.
The situation existed despite repeated surprise home visits and a woman telling sheriff’s deputies in 2006 that her sex offender neighbor was living with small children.
The state last year paid Dugard a $20 million settlement under which officials acknowledged repeated mistakes were made by parole agents responsible for monitoring Garrido. California has since increased monitoring of sex offenders.