An unexpected result of President Obama’s new opening to Iran is that US taxpayers are now funding both sides of the Middle East’s arms race. The United States is deliberately subsidizing defense spending for allies like Egypt and Israel, and is now inadvertently paying for some of Iran’s military expenditures as well.
It starts with $1.7 billion the US Treasury wired to Iran’s Central Bank in January, during a delicate prisoner swap and the implementation of last summer’s nuclear deal, to resolve a long-standing dispute about Iran’s arms purchases before the revolution of 1979.
For months it was unclear what Iran would do with this money. The mystery was solved in May when Iran’s Guardian Council approved the government’s 2017 budget that instructed Iran’s Central Bank to transfer the $1.7 billion to the military.
Saeed Ghasseminejad, an associate fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, spotted the budget item. He told me the development was widely reported in Iran by numerous sources including the state-funded news services.
Republicans and some Democrats who opposed Obama’s nuclear deal have argued that the end of some sanctions would help fund Iran’s military. But at least that was Iran’s money already (albeit frozen in overseas bank accounts). The $1.7 billion that Treasury transferred to Iran in January is different.
About $400 million of it came from a trust fund comprising money paid by the government of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, a US ally, for arms sold to Iran before the 1979 revolution. The remaining $1.3 billion represents interest on the $400 million principle over more than 36 years.
According to a letter from the State Department to Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) who has called for an investigation into the January payment, that money came out of something known as the Judgment Fund, which is “a source of funding to pay judgments and claims against the United States when there is no other source of funding.”
At the time of the transfer in January, the Obama administration said the $1.7 billion payment was a bargain for taxpayers because the United States would probably have to pay a steeper interest rate had the matter been adjudicated at The Hague.
Nonetheless, the $1.7 billion payment has still rankled Obama’s critics. In January, many observers, including Pompeo, said the transfer was more like a ransom payment because it coincided with the release of five Americans detained in Iran. The Iranian commander of the Basiji militia, Mohammad Reza Naghdi, said at the time: “Taking this much money back was in return for the release of the American spies.” The White House disputed this claim.
The irony here is that Iran has been pleading poverty in recent months. The country’s supreme leader and foreign minister have publicly complained that Iran’s economy hasn’t seen the benefits expected from the Iran nuclear deal. Yet Iran’s 2017 $19 billion defense budget has increased by 90 percent from 2016, according to Ghasseminejad.
We now know where $1.7 billion of that came from.
© 2016, Bloomberg View