US News

Questions About Erin Andrews Peephole Video Probe

The Web site where voyeur videos of ESPN sideline reporter Erin Andrews first appeared has yet to be called by police — raising doubts about how aggressively the case is being pursued.

“We have not been contacted by authorities or heard from investigators,” a spokesman for Dailymotion told The Post yesterday.

Computer-security experts said cops could quickly find the peeping Tom’s identity by subpoenaing the site’s records.

Andrews’ lawyer, Marshall Grossman, refused to say which authorities had been contacted about the case and why no law enforcement had yet reached out to the site.

“For any investigation to have the maximum chance of success, it is wise not to publicly comment on it,” Grossman said.

A person using the online handle “Goblazers1” in February posted a half-dozen video clips showing Andrews, 31, nude in a hotel room, brushing her hair.

The videos were shot though a peephole, with the striking blond sports journalist unaware of the voyeur.

The posting by “Goblazers1” did not identify Andrews by name.

The city where the video was shot has not been identified, and no law-enforcement agency has said it is investigating. The FBI has said it is not involved.

Andrews notified ESPN of the videos on July 16 and asked for help taking them down, a network spokesman said.

ESPN’s general counsel then sent out a letter demanding they be removed, without mentioning Andrews by name.

That letter sparked speculation among site operators that the woman was Andrews. Shortly afterward, her lawyer confirmed it was her and threatened legal action against people displaying the images.

Todd Stefan, of the Los Angeles computer investigation firm Setec Investigations, said it was “surprising” that authorities had not contacted Dailymotion.

“You want to preserve these records so they’re not inadvertently lost or destroyed,” he said.

Stefan noted that when such images are uploaded, “there’s a lot of these digital fingerprints, if you will, that get left behind.”

Andrews has stayed out of sight since the story broke.

ESPN yesterday declined to discuss her contract terms, but people familiar with the network say she is likely on nothing more than a two-year pact and earns up to $150,000 annually.

dan.mangan@nypost.com